The overhead cost that should be allocated to Zeta via activity-based costing is $356,000.
The following formula for determining the overhead cost allocated to Zeta:
= Zeta pool no 1 ÷ total pool no 1 × pool cost + zeta pool no 2 ÷ total pool no 2 × pool cost + zeta pool no 3 ÷ total pool no 3 × pool cost
= 2,800 ÷ 4,000 × $160,000 + 55 ÷ 100 × $280,000 + 750 ÷ 3,000 x $360,000
= $356,000
Therefore we can conclude that the overhead cost that should be allocated to Zeta via activity-based costing is $356,000.
Learn more about the overhead here: brainly.com/question/11950737
Answer:
0.98
Explanation:
Computation for Bill Duke portfolio's beta
First step is to find the Investment in Y which is:
Investment in Y=100,000-35,000
=$65,000
Second step is to calculate for the Portfolio beta using this formula
Portfolio beta=Respective beta*Respective Investment weight
Portfolio beta =(35,000/100,000*1.5)+(65,000/100,000*0.7)
Portfolio beta=(0.35*1.5) +(0.65*0.7)
Portfolio beta =0.525 +0.455
Portfolio beta=0.98
Therefore the Portfolio Beta will be 0.98
Strategy is a sustainable and dominant market share the set of actions a firm takes to achieve a competitive advantage.
<h3>What is Competitive advantage strategy?</h3>
Competitive advantage can be explained as factors that influence a company to produce goods or services and be able to stand out compare to her other company in that industry.
These advantages help the company to be able to produce and generate more sales compared to its market rivals.
Learn more about competitive advantage at:
brainly.com/question/9067127
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is 80/20.
Explanation:
The Pareto Principle was described by economist and sociologist Vilfredo Pareto, which specifies an unequal relationship between inputs and outputs. The principle states that 20% of what goes into or is invested is responsible for 80% of the results obtained. In other words, 80% of the consequences derive from 20% of the causes; This is also known as the "Pareto rule" or the "80/20 rule."
The principle does not stipulate that all situations are going to show exactly this relationship, it refers to a typical distribution. In general, the principle can be interpreted as a minority of causes deriving from most of the results.