The approach suggest that a firm's cost of retained earnings can be estimated by adding a risk premium of 3% to 5% points to the before-tax interest rate on the firm's own long-term debt.
The bond-yield-plus-risk-premium approach does assumes that cost of equity is closely related to the firm's cost of debt.
- The premium approach does help to determine the value of an assetof a company's such as its traded equity.
However, the approach suggest that a firm's cost of retained earnings can be estimated by adding a risk premium of 3% to 5% points to the before-tax interest rate on the firm's own long-term debt.
Read more about the premium approach:
<em>brainly.com/question/20354983</em>
Answer:
The primary difference between those two concepts is focus that each term has. The first one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the level of return. While the second one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the amount of factors used for that production.
Explanation:
One the one hand, the law of diminishing marginal returns is a concept known in the microeconomics theory due to the fact that it establishes the relationship between the productivity and the income for every aspect of it. Meaning that, when the productivity increases because of the increase of only one factor of production then the income will start to slowly decrease, confirming that when only one factor is increased the production will start to be incomplete and the return will decrease for that.
On the other hand, the law of diminishing marginal rate of technical substitution indicates the relationship between the level of output and the different factor used to produce. Meaning that, it shows how to keep the level of output the same while making changes in the amount of factors used.
Answer:
Explanation:
The preparation of ta static budget report for the second quarter is shown below:
CROIX COMPANY
Sales Budget Report
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2017
Second Quarter Year to date
Product Line Budget Actual Difference Budget Actual Difference
New Guitar $383,500 $387,400 $3,900 $700,200 $690,500 $9,700
Favorable Unfavorable
The year to date balances are computed below:
For Budget:
= $383,500 + $316,700
= $700,200
For Actual:
= $387,400 + $690,500
= 690,500
Answer: $15,500
Explanation:
First we calculate the estimated Uncollecteble debt,
= 6% of 310,000
= 0.06 (310,000)
= $18,600
We will then subtract the existing $3,100 to find out how much we will send to the Bad Debt Expense account because the amount already in the account needs to be included in the $18,600.
= 18,600 - 3,100
= $15,500
We will therefore Debit the Bad Debt Expense account with $15,500 and Credit the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts with the same amount.
If you need any clarification do react or comment.
Answer:
formed a valid contract because Rachel's outward expressions showed the formation of a contract.
Explanation:
In contract, outward expressions refers to a situation when both parties has directly communicate the terms of a certain transaction and agreed upon it.
The contract is considered as 'valid' and considered to be a verbal agreement as soon as Rachel proposed a price and Julius agreed upon it.
One thing to remember, Even though this contract is considered as valid , it would be hard for Julius to held Rachel accountable to court since he has no way to proof that the verbal agreement has been made.
