1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mice21 [21]
3 years ago
15

Throughout the years, most Presidents have used the armed forces without a declaration of war. Many people argue that this is __

___.
A. constitutional

B. a mandated power

C. unconstitutional

D. an expressed power
History
2 answers:
Komok [63]3 years ago
7 0
I would say that using the armed forces without a declaration of war would be unconstitutional because I believe that a declaration of war would require consultation with the representatives of the people rather than just being an apparently arbitrary decision.
____ [38]3 years ago
6 0

The answer is Unconstitutional   Hope this helps! :)

You might be interested in
How did the ruling in McDonald v. Chicago impact federalism?
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

Answer to the following question is as follows;

Explanation:

The city of Chicago claims that enforcing the 2nd Amendment against both the states would change the balance of power between the federal and state governments. A number of states supporting McDonald believe that worries about federalism are unfounded since the right to keep and bear weapons is a basic right.

6 0
3 years ago
Why did stalin want the united states and britina to open a second front asaignr germany?
lukranit [14]
The reason why Stalin pushed so hard for the US and Britain to open a second front against Germany was because Russia was bearing the burden of Germany's advance all by itself, and was suffering a great deal of losses in the process. 
7 0
3 years ago
How were the english civil war and the french revolution similar?
SpyIntel [72]
Both were fought over the government and gave more power to the common man.
5 0
3 years ago
How did the Massachusetts Government Act of 1774 change the way Massachusetts was governed?
arsen [322]

Answer: A. It banned colonial assembly.

Explanation:

The British government viewed the Colony of Massachusetts as a threat due to its continued defiance of British mandates and its seemingly leading role in the rebellion of the other colonies to British directives as well.

The last straw to the British was the Boston Tea Part after which Parliament passed the Massachusetts Government Act of 1774 which placed Massachusetts directly under the control of a Royal governor who had absolute powers and suspended the Colonial assembly in order to remove any illusion of self-governance the people had.

3 0
3 years ago
List a major accomplishment of each of these men: John Locke.
melamori03 [73]

Answer: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what area of Africa did the early Bantu originate?
    12·1 answer
  • What Happened In Alcatraz Prison?
    6·1 answer
  • Which country first popularized iced tea?
    11·1 answer
  • A famous victory over the mongols took place when people living in the present day region of ____________ gathered in grobnik fi
    7·2 answers
  • A boy, age twelve, had friends who convinced him to carry a gun to a robbery. No one was injured in the robbery, and the boy nev
    11·2 answers
  • What ideas did thomas paine promote in common sense? check all of the boxes that apply. monarchies were dangerous. britain had r
    12·2 answers
  • A. ¿Por qué se intentaba entre los años 1800 hasta 1900 evitar una especie de colonialismo a Latinoamérica?
    8·1 answer
  • What change occurred after the South African War.
    15·1 answer
  • What was the United States' imperialist motivation for the annexation<br> of The Samoan Islands?
    7·1 answer
  • At approximately 8265 feet, _______ is the second highest peak in Texas.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!