Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
One of the most dramatic standoffs in the history of the Cold War begins as the Soviet Union blocks all road and rail traffic to and from West Berlin
This activity helped in understanding bush's vision of a new world order.
<h3>What is
bush's vision?</h3>
"The vision thing," a remark made by George H. W. Bush before of the 1988 presidential election when asked to think about his intentions for the presidency.
Among Bush's most significant domestic policy accomplishments were the approval of two large tax cuts during his presidency: the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003.
Bush's campaign focused on erecting a "Firewall" in the South, a tactic that paid off when he won many primaries there on March 8.
To know more about bush's vision follow the link:
brainly.com/question/19609947
#SPJ4
The question is wrong in some way please write it correctly