That a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the United States' constitution if it lacks a secular purpose, has its primary effect as promoting or inhibiting religion, or fosters an excessive entanglement of government with religion.
Used to assess whether a law violates the Establishment Clause. The "Establishment Clause" was intended to prevent any governmental endorsement or support of religion.
Answer:
Rule of law is a principle under which all persons, institutions, and entities are accountable to laws that are: Publicly promulgated. Equally enforced. Independently adjudicated. And consistent with international human rights principles.
Hope this helps!
Sincerely; Victoria<3
Explanation:
The difference between the Trial courts and Appellate courts is that the Trial courts answer questions of fact, whereas the Appellate courts tend to answer questions of law.
Appellate Courts advocacy tends to sometimes looks cool, but not so, as it is one which has to envisage the intricacies of the proceedings which happened before the Trial courts and then, he or she can find out actual errors in the reasoning of the trial court.
The appellate courts tend to not retry the cases or hear any new evidence. As, here they are said to not hear any given witnesses testify. Thus, here there is no jury.
Hence, it is said that the Appellate courts tends to review the procedures and the decisions in the trial court.
To learn more about the Appellate Courts here:
brainly.com/question/29766399
#SPJ4