<h3>
Answer: x > 2</h3>
Work Shown:
5x - 14x < - 18
-9x < - 18
x > -18/(-9)
x > 2
The inequality sign flips when dividing both sides by a negative number.
Here's another approach you could take.
5x - 14x < - 18
-9x < -18
0 < -18+9x
18 < 9x
9x > 18
x > 18/9
x > 2
It's a slightly longer pathway, but it avoids a sign flip when you divide both sides by the positive number 9.
The sign flip happens two steps earlier when going from 18 < 9x to 9x > 18. In other words, A < B is the same as B > A.
When applying indirect proofs, we assume the negation of the conclusion is true, and show that this assumption would lead to nonsense, or contradiction.
In our case we assume a is not smaller than 7, that is we assume a≥7.
a≥7 then, multiplying both sides by 3:
3a≥21, then, adding both sides 7:
3a+7≥28,
which is a contradiction because 3a+7 is smaller than 28.
So our assumption is wrong, which means the opposite of it is correct.
Answer: assume a≥7
Answer:
Equations 1 & 3 are correct.
Explanation:
Equation 2's actual answer is -8, and Equation 4's actual answer is positive 7.
Answer:
m = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
![m=\frac{rise}{run}=\frac{13-5}{6-2}=\frac{8}{4}=\boxed{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=m%3D%5Cfrac%7Brise%7D%7Brun%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B13-5%7D%7B6-2%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B8%7D%7B4%7D%3D%5Cboxed%7B2%7D)
Hope this helps.