Answer:
State ownership
Explanation:
State ownership, or government ownership, or public ownership, is a form of ownership were the government owns or partly owns as well has control over a business with the revenue from the business or establishment being added as benefits accruable to the welfare of the public
The characteristics of a state ownership are;
1) State ownership means that the government is the owner, or part owner of the establishment, where part ownership belongs to the public
2) The main purpose of a state owned business is not to make profit, but rather to provide public welfare, that benefits the residents of the country
3) The profits from the business are entered into the treasury of the state and are used to carry out public welfare projects
4) The employees of the government are the managers of the establishment which is subject to bureaucracy, and the business is operated with a state selected board of directors
5) The government determines the manner of stability present in the business, as well as the winding up of state owned businesses that have no function
6) The state owned business is operated by the laws and policy if the business and it is therefore recognized as an autonomous body
Answer:
D. Interest rate effect
Explanation:
Interest Rate Effect can be defined as the rate that occur due to the change in borrowing and spending attitude of a person after the interest rate might have been adjusted because in a situation where the interest rates rises it will enable both businesses and consumers to cut back on their spending the result of which will cause earnings to fall and stock prices to drop due to the fact that as the interest rates move up, the cost of borrowing becomes more expensive which is why interest rates that are high tend to always reduce inflationary pressures and cause an appreciation in the exchange rate
Answer:
<h2>Considering absence of collusion,the firms will choose low price in this instance.</h2>
Explanation:
- First,focusing on all the possible payoffs for the firms under low price situation, the possible individual payoffs for the firms are $8 million and $16 million considering that the other firm chooses low price and high price respectively.
- Now, regarding the individual payoffs from choosing high price, the possible payoffs for the firms are $12 million and $4 million, considering that the other firm chooses high price and low price respectively.
- Therefore, notice that considering all possible scenarios,both the minimum and maximum payoffs from choosing low price are actually higher than the same estimates under choosing higher price.
- Hence, to ensure a higher subsequent individual payoff, both the firms would expectedly choose lower price considering the possibilities of both higher minimum and maximum payoff compared to choosing higher price.
Answer:
Lorenzo
Explanation:
Since economist Lorenzo believes that the people's expectations about inflation change very quickly in response to new monetary policies (in this case contractionary monetary policies), he will favor monetary policies that will try to lower inflation to 5%. Since people respond quickly to monetary policies, the associated costs of reducing inflation (cooling down the economy, higher interest rates, etc.) will not be high.
Instead, economists like Sam that believe that the people do not respond quickly to changes in the monetary policy will believe that the cost of reducing inflation through contractionary policies is too high and will hurt the economy too much.