1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dybincka [34]
2 years ago
9

How did John get the alcohol

Law
2 answers:
kozerog [31]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

from a bar or friends party

Vera_Pavlovna [14]2 years ago
5 0
I’m sorry he was thirsty
You might be interested in
Seatbelts keeps the force required to stop them smaller.
Rainbow [258]
The correct answer is true.
8 0
3 years ago
The rate of alcohol absorption is the same for everyone.<br> A. True<br> B. False
Dennis_Churaev [7]
False
Different people have different alcohol absorption rates. This is genetic, and gets passed through one’s family.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Contributing to the common good ____.
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

Option C

Explanation:

Contributing to the common good is a duty of all citizens. Try this

6 0
1 year ago
Hsjdhdvdjdudhdbdbdbdudhdhrjevehd
emmasim [6.3K]
You are absolutely right i agree
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the supreme court case new jersey v TLO questioned the right students had in public schools. tlo was a new jersey high school st
Oksanka [162]
The SCOTUS did not rule that T.L.O’s 4th amendment (searches and seizures) rights had been violated. They ruled that the school administrations search of the bag was reasonable under the circumstances (i.e T.L.O. Being a minor and on school property, meaning that while at school, administration is responsible for the well-being and safety of all students, thus allowing them to search T.L.O’s bag for marijuana). A good way to think of it is that while you’re at school, the administration acts as your parents. Your parents don’t need a warrant to search through your room and neither does the administration if you are on school property. The 4th amendment applies to this case because it protects against unlawful searches and seizures (i.e. searches and seizures that are without a warrant). The constitutional question was whether or not T.L.O. Could be charged with a crime/punished or not because the school administration did not have a warrant. However, because the school administration was acting as a loco parentis (latin term for “in place of the parent”) they did not need a warrant to search her bag. Hope this helped!
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Harry Potter accelerated reader test
    9·2 answers
  • During training as Special Agents, trainees _____.
    9·1 answer
  • "In American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant, American Express (Amex) entered into agreements with Italian Colors Restauran
    6·1 answer
  • Question 1 of 10 Which of the following is an obligation of creditors in the debtor-creditor relationship? A. To make threats to
    15·1 answer
  • The concepts of Expectation, Reliance and Nominal damages are incompatible with Sections 73 and 74 of Contract Act. Furthermore,
    6·1 answer
  • 2+2<br> a:3<br> b:5<br> c:70<br> e:none of the above
    11·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP
    15·1 answer
  • What are the benefits of the Dg pickup program.
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!! IM FAILING!!!!!!!!!!!
    7·2 answers
  • 21. Compensation for senators is
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!