Answer:
Insatiation
Explanation:
Insatiation is an economic problem which arises as a result of human wants and cravings being limitless with a limited means of satisfying these wants
Economic problem of insatiation can be solved when there are also unlimited means of satisfying the limitless wants and desires of human
Answer:
Common Size Income Statement
Explanation:
In a common size income statement, each line item of the Income statement is expressed as a percentage of the sales amount for that period.
This helps in comparing performance of companies in different sectors or industries.
Answer:
bill of lading
Explanation:
Bill of lading is a legal document issue when goods are transferred from one place to another. It is issued by the freight carrier to the person who is shipping the goods. This document contains details such as which goods are shipped, quantity, details of destination. It also serves the purpose of shipment receipt, once the goods are delivered at mentioned destination in the document. To make sure that requisite goods has been correctly received the destination and shipped correctly from the shipper, the document is signed by authorized person from the receiver, the shipper, and the carrier.
The objective of such document is
- preventing theft of goods.
- Create transparency of transaction.
- Serves as a legal proof in case of any conflict.
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
- Breach of duty.
- Strict liability.
- Recklessness.
- Negligence per se
And this is the correct answer:
Explanation:
Negligence per se consist in act that is neglectful, or unlawful, because it explicitely violates a statue or regulation.
In this case, the statue was the new state law that required smoke detectors to be maintained. The company that installed the smoke detector inside Jose's house clearly did not maintain the detector because otherwise, it would have gone off when the fire started, and Jose probably would not have died.
It is a negligence per se from the smoke detector company, and Jose's wife can lawfully sue them for that very reason.
Answer:
3.45%
Explanation:
the real wage at the beginning of the recession (12/07) = nominal wage / price index Dec. 2007 = $17.70 / 2.1141 = $8.3721
the real wage at the end of the recession (6/09) = nominal wage / price index June 2009 = $18.53 / 2.14527= $8.6609
% change in real wage = [($8.6609 - $8.3721) / $8.3721] x 100 = 3.44955% = 3.45%
Due to the recession, the price index changed less than the nominal wages since the inflation rate was very low. It is normal that during recessions, specially severe ones, the inflation rate decreases or even turns negative (what happened in Europe in those years).
