You can't. If you think about the straight line on a graph, those numbers
describe a single point that the line goes through, and they don't tell you
anything about the slope of the line, or where it crosses the x-axis or the
y-axis. So I don't think you can tell the constant of variation from one point.
(Простите, пожалуйста, мой английский. Русский не мой родной язык. Надеюсь, у вас есть способ перевести это решение. Если нет, возможно, прилагаемое изображение объяснит достаточно.)
Use the shell method. Each shell has a height of 3 - 3/4 <em>y</em> ², radius <em>y</em>, and thickness ∆<em>y</em>, thus contributing an area of 2<em>π</em> <em>y</em> (3 - 3/4 <em>y</em> ²). The total volume of the solid is going to be the sum of infinitely many such shells with 0 ≤ <em>y</em> ≤ 2, thus given by the integral

Or use the disk method. (In the attachment, assume the height is very small.) Each disk has a radius of √(4/3 <em>x</em>), thus contributing an area of <em>π</em> (√(4/3 <em>x</em>))² = 4<em>π</em>/3 <em>x</em>. The total volume of the solid is the sum of infinitely many such disks with 0 ≤ <em>x</em> ≤ 3, or by the integral

Using either method, the volume is 6<em>π</em> ≈ 18,85. I do not know why your textbook gives a solution of 90,43. Perhaps I've misunderstood what it is you're supposed to calculate? On the other hand, textbooks are known to have typographical errors from time to time...
85.25 would be one thenth of 8.524
Answer:
y = x + 5: x=y−5
2x + y = 17
: x=-1/2y+17/2
Step-by-step explanation:
I do not exactly know what you were asking but I just answered the questions, if that is not what you were looking for tell me so I can try and edit my answer