SOMEBODY, PLEASE REWORD THIS! I WILL GIVE THE BRAINLIEST!

English

1 answer:

STatiana [176]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

During the debate, Jimmy Carter was the candidate who introduced contentions upheld by proof that was not extremely effective and thusly was fruitless when Ronald Reagan showed proof that his contentions weren't right.

This happened when Carter delivered data that said his administration's rules had the option to diminish the pace of swelling by 10%, which considered better progress on the lookout and a lower pace of joblessness.

Nonetheless, Ronald Reagan countered these contentions with better data upheld by proof, showing that Carter did for sure set up a superior economy through his authority, yet swelling took off during his administration. To demonstrate this, Reagan showed raw numbers that advanced the achievement of his contention.

You might be interested in

The people could fly main events

Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

shzbdbdbbfdbndmskanakska

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Decide whether the following statement is fact or opinion. Salmon live in the ocean for several years, growing to a large size O

denpristay [2]

Answer:

The correct answer is fact.

4 0

3 years ago

. Which sentence needs a semicolon added to be correct?

ivann1987 [24]

It is B. The semicolon should be between everywhere and it's. I.e. "....everywhere;it''s..."

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

CRITICALLY DISCUSS IMPACT THAT LENIN ECONOMIC POLICIES BETWEEN 1917-1924 HAD ON THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY

shutvik [7]

Although the economy began to develop at first, in 1920, a civil war started which caused many bad things for the Russian economy. The government began obsessed with overtaking the westerners and this <span>caused the economy to suffer and caused economic disintegration, isolation, and famine.</span>

3 0

2 years ago

The Case for Mars

AfilCa [17]

There are advantages as well as disadvantages of colonization of humans on planet Mars.

<h3>Compare the colonization of humans on Mars of both articles</h3>

Both the articles talk about the Mars. One article says that colonization of humans on Mars is very important and necessary while on the other hand, the other article says that the environment of Mars is not suitable for the living of humans. So one article opposed the colonization of humans on Mars whereas the other is agreed with the colonization of humans on Mars.

So we can conclude that there are advantages as well as disadvantages of colonization of humans on planet Mars.

Learn more about Mars here: brainly.com/question/644043

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago