Answer:
During the debate, Jimmy Carter was the candidate who introduced contentions upheld by proof that was not extremely effective and thusly was fruitless when Ronald Reagan showed proof that his contentions weren't right.
This happened when Carter delivered data that said his administration's rules had the option to diminish the pace of swelling by 10%, which considered better progress on the lookout and a lower pace of joblessness.
Nonetheless, Ronald Reagan countered these contentions with better data upheld by proof, showing that Carter did for sure set up a superior economy through his authority, yet swelling took off during his administration. To demonstrate this, Reagan showed raw numbers that advanced the achievement of his contention.
