1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amm1812
3 years ago
6

“The entire universe is purposeful” How far do you agree with this notion? Whether agree or disagree,

History
1 answer:
Amiraneli [1.4K]3 years ago
5 0

The entire universe is purposeful as the evolution of life depicts how everyone has a role to play on Earth.

  • Life didn't "pop up"  accidentally on this particular planet called Earth. Earth was designed to accommodate human beings. No matter how big or small the purpose is, everyone on Earth has a purpose.

  • There's no one that's purposeless. One common purpose to every human is survival. As individuals, we strive daily on how to survive and meet our needs.

In conclusion, everyone has a purpose.

Read related link on:

brainly.com/question/24484641

You might be interested in
Did the Federalists or Anti- Federalists have more influence on the "Bill of Rights?"
Tatiana [17]

The Anti-Federalists had more influence on the Bill of Rights, as they were the ones who wanted it in the first place. The Federalists thought a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, while the Anti-Federalists pushed for it.

The Articles of Confederation was the United States' first constitution. It was very weak and gave little to no power to the federal government. The federal government could not tax the states, regulate trade, create and enforce laws properly, and numerous other important matters. The Anti-Federalists agreed with this, as they associated having a strong government with British tyranny. They thought that if the government was powerful, they may abuse the citizens. The Federalists on the other hand wanted a stronger government. They believed that having a strong government meant having a strong country, and they thought the Articles of Confederation was doing more harm than good. When the Constitutional Convention of 1787 occurred, the Articles of Confederation was only meant to be changed. It ended up getting thrown out all together and the United States Constitution was created instead. The Anti-Federalists disagreed with this and demanded to have a Bill of Rights, which would protect the citizen's rights. The Federalists thought this wasn't needed, as the states had the powers that the federal government did not. The Anti-Federalists insisted though and believed it was important that they had a proper document protecting their rights.

The Anti-Federalists had more influence while creating the Bill of Rights because they were the ones who pushed for it in the first place. They thought having a document to protect the rights of the citizens was needed, while the Federalists thought it was essentially useless as the states already had all of the powers that the federal government did not hold.

5 0
3 years ago
under the economic system of merceantilism the merchent class paid taxes to support the armys of their naations what value did t
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

They enacted policies that would benefit the merchants.

Explanation:

The whole point of mercantilism was to take materials from the colonies to give to the mainland. Those materials could be used to make goods that they sent back to the colonies. So then the merchants used the deals with the government to set up chop and sell their goods. So they paid the army and the government helped their business.

8 0
3 years ago
What was not an effect of the New Deal programs on American life?
stellarik [79]

<u>B.</u> <u>The economy rebounded to 1928 levels</u> was not an effect of the New Deal programs.

If the economy was similar to how it was in 1928, then the country would still be in a depression.

8 0
3 years ago
Which best describes the early Byzantine state’s relationship with the Christian church?
masya89 [10]
The answer is C. <span>Byzantine rulers were considered divine with absolute power.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
What was the intention<br> behind the termination<br> policy?
umka21 [38]

Answer:

The Indian Termination Policy was intended to assimilate the Native Americans as individuals (as opposed to one ethnic group) into mainstream Western civilization. At least, that was the belief. It was established by Congress as a means of ending all relations between Native American Tribes and the federal government.

Explanation:

i hope i helped :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who or what was the "New Scare" or menace in America during the early Cold War era?
    7·2 answers
  • After the French and Indian War, the British asked the colonies to do which of the following?
    13·1 answer
  • Why were the Nile cataracts a problem for Kush? A. Their trading boats were unable to go past them. B. Many sailors died on them
    15·1 answer
  • \\ IM HAVING DIFFICULTY WITH THIS. \\
    12·2 answers
  • How were African Americans in the South impacted by the Compromise of 1877?
    12·1 answer
  • Which English document first granted the right of citizens to ask the king for help
    5·1 answer
  • History question own below
    7·2 answers
  • Identifying Types of Sources<br> Which of these is an example of a primary source?
    10·1 answer
  • Bulgaria romanis and turkey are in which capita gpd range
    12·1 answer
  • How does using the Mercator map impact how we look at the world?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!