The tang land reform policy strengthen the central government :
-by breaking up the localized power of large landowners
-by increasing revenue through more land taxes
<h3>What are
tang land reform?</h3>
- As part of the tang land reform, the Tang emperor distributed land among the peasants.
- This policy weakened the power of large landowners.
- At the same time, state revenue increased as farmers were able to pay taxes.
- First, land similar to that adopted by the Sui was allocated to large families.
- Second, government officials were given "public land."
- These parcels vary in size depending on the recipient's government office.
- This system was designed to control land from large landowners such as nobles.
- They will redistribute land to farmers.
- This made the farmers richer and allowed them to pay more tang land reform to the government.
To learn more about tang land reform from the given link :
brainly.com/question/2324592
#SPJ4
The correct answer is C) He helped secure 15 military installations, over 25 research facilities, and federal funding for construction.
<em>The statement that describes how Richard B. Russell Jr. contributed to Georgia’s economic growth is “He helped secure 15 military installations, over 25 research facilities, and federal funding for construction.”
</em>
When elected in 1920, Richard B. Russell Jr. became one of the youngest members of the Georgia House of Representatives. He was known for strengthening national defense and as well as Georgia economic opportunities.
Richard B. Russell Jr. (1897-1971) was a Democrat that became the 66th Governor of the state of Georgia from 1931-1933, and then he was Senator from 1933 to 1971. Richard B. Russell Jr. contributed to Georgia’s economic growth in that he helped secure 15 military installations, over 25 research facilities, and federal funding for construction.
Answer:
Explanation:
During this period, Barbados became an English Colony in 1624 and the Caribbean's Jamaica in 1655.
plz mark as brainliest
Answer:
I agree with the other comments but remember how different things are now.
Back in Jefferson’s time, there were thousands of small newspapers, they were usually just a page or two and they were all independent. Today corporations own most newspapers and they force them to toe the company line when it comes to what they can print. TV and radio are worse, most are just propaganda outlets (Fox is among the worst) and are in the entertainment business not in the news business. The PBS stations are independent when it comes to local events but most get national news from PBS or NPR, they are pretty good but they are slanted to the left.
You have to be very careful who you trust, the foreign sources are best because they don’t gain much by pushing one view or another. Even there you have to be sure they aren’t just a mouthpiece for China or Russia.
