Answer:
a. Long Cycle Theory
Explanation:
In international relations theory, the Long Cycle Theory was first presented by George Modelski in his book <em>Long Cycles in World Politics</em> (1987). Modelski claims that <u>the US replacing Britain as the leader of the International System after World War II is part of a cycle in international relations where one hegemon is gradually replaced by another over a period of roughly a century</u>.
The transition from one hegemonic power to another leads to the new world power carrying on the costs associated with such a position. And unlike defenders of the realist school of international relations, Modelski doesn't see this cycle as produced by the anarchy of the internationals system, but rather as a natural consequence of economic and political developments, including wars. According to him, Portugal was the world hegemon in the 16th century, Netherlands in the 17th century, Britain stretched his period of international dominance over the 18th and 19th century, and since the 20th century, the United States is the world's dominant hegemon.
If they don't copyright anything they should be fine just make sure you give credit to your sources
Knowing about the effects of the perceived distance of objects on their perceived size can help us understand the moon illusion.
<h3>What is the moon illusion?</h3>
The moon illusion refers to an optical illusion in which the Moon looks bigger when it's rising or setting and smaller when it is high in the sky. Photographs have proven that the Moon is the same width near the horizon as when it's high in the sky. However, that isn't what we perceive with our eyes. Therefore, it's an illusion that is rooted in the way our brains process visual information.
Many different explanations were offered for this immensely powerful real-world illusion over the centuries. Today, the explanation for this illusion is still debated.
Find out more about the moon illusion here: brainly.com/question/13025783
#SPJ4
Its true
It will never bring development because you will never have an agreement. You need to have the same purpose so you can work together and have some progress. But it can also be wrong because what if you have two teams working on different projects? Your teams have a disagreement, but both are developing different solutions to the same problem. Still developing but with a different idea. It all depends on your perspective.
