Answer:
Final Value= $414,135.43
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Quarterly deposit= $32,000
Number of quarters= 3*4= 12
Interest rate= 0.0545/4= 0.01363
To calculate the final value, we need to use the following formula:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= quarterly deposit
FV= {32,000*[(1.01363^12)-1]} / 0.01363
FV= $414,135.43
Answer and Explanation:
In the given case, the second will would be destroyed non-intentionally by the testatrix that represent the person who writes the will. Also the second will would have be intended to revoke the first will
In addition to this, Testatrix intends the second will to be value also at the same time she dont want the first will to be probated
So the second will would be upheld because of testamentary motive.
Answer:
$1,200,000
Explanation:
Jack Corporation
Carrying value before net loss:
($1,500,000 - (20% x $1,000,000))
=$1,500,000-$200,000
= $1,300,000
Jack's share of net loss recognized in full:
20% x $6,000,000
= $1,200,000
Therefore the amount of loss should Jack report in its income statement for 2021 relative to its investment in Jill will be $1,200,000
Answer:
10.29%
Explanation:
Rule of 72 can be defined as a metric used to determine the time it will take to double an investment based on its growth rate.
To find the interest rate Kari must receive for her investment to double in 7 years, we would use the Rule of 72;
Rule of 72 = 72/7
Rule of 72 = 10.29%
Therefore, Kari must receive an interest rate of 10.29% for her investment to double in 7 years.
During the 1970s, some economists argued that the cause of the woes of the economy was due to d.) supply shock due to issues with the supply of oil
<h3>What was the
economic crisis of the 1970s?</h3>
This refers to the term that is used to discuss and describe the economic crisis that threatened to engulf the United States financial sector due to certain influences such as the 1973 oil crisis, the fall outs of the Vietnam War under President Johnson and many other factors.
Hence, it can be seen that with these factors in mind, the main argument of some economists was that the cause of the woes of the economy was due to d.) supply shock due to issues with the supply of oil as can be found in option D which is true because of the supply shock which helped to cripple the US economy.
Read more about economic crisis of the 1970s here:
brainly.com/question/1549639
#SPJ1
