Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
1+2+2+3+3+3+4+5+6+6+7+7+7+8+9=73
73/15≈5
Lateral area: 339.29
surface area: 565.49
Answer:
b. We have very strong evidence that the long-run average guess of the population size of Milwaukee, Wisconsin is smaller with the anchor of Green Bay than with the anchor of Chicago.
Step-by-step explanation:
Smaller p-value indicates a strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis which means we can reject the null hypothesis. In the given scenario the p-value is 0.0001 which is very small. There is sufficient evidence for the rejection of null hypothesis.