Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
Below are the choices:
Proposed a 'middle ground' option to break deadlocks.
Worked to avoid options that others might disagree with.
Used your influence to make sure your own ideas were accepted.
Tried to find one solution which satisfies everyone's expectations.
<span>Changed your own position to accommodate the interests of others.
The answer: </span><span>Tried to find one solution which satisfies everyone's expectations.</span>
Answer:
true
Explanation:
the rural and suburban dwellers are for spread out so less crime and city dwellers are closer so more crime .
Mike using Rational choice theory perspective
<u>Explanation:</u>
Rational choice theory explains social happenings as consequences of personal choices that can in some way be explained as rational. The fundamental assumption of this theory is that aggregate social practice proceeds from the performance of unique characters, who is executing their personal choices. Selections are “rational” if people face any regularity standard as outlined by a decision theory and are fit to perform precise intentions, given the restrictions of the condition.
Here personal choice of men choosing nursing career is considered and explained that good pay and some more reasons as a consequence in the theoretical perspective of Rational choice theory.
Answer:
Some historians believe that two-party regimes foster centrism by encouraging political parties to pursue common ground that appeals to a broad range of voters. It has the potential to lead to political prosperity, which in turn will lead to economic development.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Please mark me as Brainliniest.
Answer:
The statement that best explains the meaning of "one person, one vote" is D. All people's votes should count equally.
Explanation:
The <em><u>One-Person, One-Vote Rule</u></em> -also called <em>one man, one vote</em>- is a principle that establishes a person's voting power should be equivalent to another person's within the same state, meaning no vote should carry more weight than other. Therefore, one could say the <em><u>One-Person, One-Vote Rule</u></em> is not only a slogan, but also the application of the principal of political equality.