So, the line created from the center of the circle to the edge of the circle creates the radius. If it were a straight line from one end of the circle, through the center, to the other end, that would create the diameter.
So, the answer is radius
Answer:
70 °
Step-by-step explanation:
We have that one side of the rhombus is equal to 4 cm and an angle of the rhombus is 110 degrees. We know that the adjacent sides of a rhombus are supplementary, which means that the sum of the angles must be 180 degrees.
We can assume that the other angle is x.
110 ° + x = 180 °
x = 180 ° -110 °
x = 70 °
The measure of the missing angle on the diagram will be 70 °.
Answer: C
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer with Step-by-step explanation:
In case of Bernoulli trails
The probability that a random variable occurs 'r' times in 'n' trails is given by

where
'p' is the probability of success of the event
Part a)
probability that no contamination occurs can be found by putting r = 0
Thus we get

part b)
The probability that at least 1 contamination occurs is given by

Applying values we get

9514 1404 393
Answer:
they are not
Step-by-step explanation:
The inverse matrix is the transpose of the cofactor matrix, divided by the determinant.
The cofactor matrix for a 2×2 matrix is ...
![\left[\begin{array}{cc}a_{22}&-a_{21}\\-a_{12}&a_{11}\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7Da_%7B22%7D%26-a_%7B21%7D%5C%5C-a_%7B12%7D%26a_%7B11%7D%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
The transpose of this will have the off-diagonal terms swapped, so the inverse matrix is ...
![\displaystyle\frac{\left[\begin{array}{cc}a_{22}&-a_{12}\\-a_{21}&a_{11}\end{array}\right]}{a_{11}a_{22}-a_{21}a_{12}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cfrac%7B%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7Da_%7B22%7D%26-a_%7B12%7D%5C%5C-a_%7B21%7D%26a_%7B11%7D%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%7D%7Ba_%7B11%7Da_%7B22%7D-a_%7B21%7Da_%7B12%7D%7D)
We see that the second matrix is the transpose of the cofactor matrix, but the determinant is (5)(2)-(3)(4) = -2, so there has clearly been no division by the determinant. The actual inverse matrix of the first one shown is ...
![\left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&2\\1.5&-2.5\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7D-1%262%5C%5C1.5%26-2.5%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
_____
You can compute the matrix product to see if you get an identity matrix. Here, the upper left term in the product is ...
(5)(2) +(4)(-3) = -2 . . . . . not 1, so the product matrix is not an identity matrix
The matrices are not inverses.