1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vikentia [17]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following describes safe handling of a muzzleloader? Wear eye and ear protection when shooting a muzzleloader. Load

a muzzleloader with several charges at a time. Prime a muzzleloader well before firing. Blow down the muzzle to clear powder residue.
History
2 answers:
fgiga [73]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is C) Prime a muzzleloader well before firing.

The option that describes safe handling of a muzzleloader is "prime a muzzleloader well before firing."

A muzzleloader is an old fire weapon in the form of a rifle. This firearm is loaded from the open end. Today, muzzleloading is a sport where participants shoot a target. It began in the 1930s as a way to preserve the tradition of muzzleloaders. When handling this weapon you have to be very cautious because powder can cause you serious damage.

Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
6 0

Prime a muzzleloader well before firing.

You might be interested in
Help po please I need to answer this​
netineya [11]
1-word processor
2-network software
3-spreadsheet
4-computer games
5-database Program
5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following explains the direction of this migratory flow?
sveticcg [70]
Answer:a is the answer
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone help me with this problem i dont get it
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Were passengers kept informed about what was happening to the titanic. use evidence from the text to explain your answer
podryga [215]
No. There was far too much chaos and many of the people didn’t believe anything was actually wrong because everyone thought the titanic was “unsinkable”
3 0
2 years ago
Why was the Free Soil Party, and Liberty Party important and major?
goldenfox [79]

Hey!

Answer:

Free-Soil Party, (1848–54), minor but influential political party in the pre-Civil War period of American history that opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories. Fearful of expanding slave power within the national government, Rep. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania in 1846 introduced into Congress his famous Wilmot Proviso, calling for the prohibition of slavery in the vast southwestern lands that had been newly acquired from Mexico. The Wilmot concept, which failed in Congress, was a direct ideological antecedent to the Free-Soil Party. Disappointed by the ambivalent position of the Whig Party toward slavery, “Conscience” Whigs held a convention in August 1848 at Buffalo, New York. There they were joined by delegates from 17 states drawn from the Liberty Party and the antislavery faction of the New York Democrats, known as “Barnburners.” The Free-Soilers’ historic slogan calling for “free soil, free speech, free labour, and free men” attracted small farmers, debtors, village merchants, and household and mill workers, who resented the prospect of black-labour competition—whether slave or free—in the territories.

In early 1840, abolitionists founded the Liberty Party as a political outlet for their antislavery beliefs. A mere eight years later, bolstered by the increasing slavery debate and growing sectional conflict, the party had grown to challenge the two mainstream political factions in many areas. In The Liberty Party, 1840–1848, Reinhard O. Johnson provides the first comprehensive history of this short-lived but important third party, detailing how it helped to bring the antislavery movement to the forefront of American politics and became the central institutional vehicle in the fight against slavery.

As the major instrument of antislavery sentiment, the Liberty organization was more than a political party and included not only eligible voters but also disfranchised African Americans and women. Most party members held evangelical beliefs, and as Johnson relates, an intense religiosity permeated most of the group’s activities. He discusses the party’s founding and its national growth through the presidential election of 1844; its struggles to define itself amid serious internal disagreements over philosophy, strategy, and tactics in the ensuing years; and the reasons behind its decline and merger into the Free Soil coalition in 1848.

<em>You can refer to these 3 paragraphs, </em>

<em>Hope it helps :)</em>

<em>Though I may be wrong :(</em>

<em>Have a great day!</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the purpose of scientific probes?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these forces did not encourage western settlement?
    9·2 answers
  • Why did the framers choose federalism?
    8·1 answer
  • What was a direct result of the desison in brown v brown v board of education
    15·1 answer
  • The 1994 Violence Against Women Act provided federal, state, and local funding opportunities, and made the public more aware of
    10·1 answer
  • What is one purpose of genocide?
    9·2 answers
  • In the supply-and-demand schedule shown above, at a price of $50, producers supply _____ cell phones and consumers demand _____
    10·1 answer
  • What are types of matters or issues that the United Nations deals with?
    9·1 answer
  • What details does marlowe use to create an idealized portrait of the rural life of shepherds?
    5·1 answer
  • What best describes Harding’s goals
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!