The answer is <span>a. attempt to make large payments or bribes to influence policy decisions of foreign governments.</span>
<span>Prefer the 6.1 percent tax-exempt investment.
Let's do the math and see why the tax-exempt investment is the better choice. For the 8.1% taxable investment, you get taxed at the rate of 28%. Which means that you only get to keep 100%-28% = 72% of your gains. So 0.72 * 8.1 = 5.832 which means your effective earning percentage is only 5.832% which is less than the 6.1% rate you get for the tax-exempt investment. Another consideration that wasn't taken into account for the question is the earnings on the taxable investment may push you up into a higher tax bracket. Which in turn increases the tax burden on your other investments. So the better choice here is the 6.1% tax-exempt investment even though that first glance the 8.1% investment looks higher.</span>
The statement is false. It would be an advantage to both the client and the organization. This would mean if the client needs a markdown from the provider they would need to pay the receipt inside 10 days to get the rebate, and this would then enable the organization to get their cash speedier.
Answer:
Yes, Amelia responsible for the $75,000
Explanation:
It is given that Kendra and Amelia are jointly operating the art gallery, they are working together as a partnership. If a person does any work in the partnership business, other has full responsibility for partnership.
In the given question Kendra Has embezzled a $75,000 government grant, which will be responsible for partnership business but in the absence of Kendra, Amelia will also be responsible for all this.
The corridor is the vertical section of the supply curve of reserves in the federal fund market.
