Answer:
pricing
Explanation:
pricing is the amount you pay a buissness for their product.
Answer:
the project's MIRR is 13.50 %.
Explanation:
MODIFIED INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (MIRR)
-It is the rate that causes the Present Value of the Terminal Value (Future Cash flows at the end of the Project) to equal Present Value of Cash outflows.
-MIRR assumes a reinvestment rate at the end of the project
The First Step is to Calculate the Terminal Value at end of year 3.
Terminal Value (FV) = Sum of (PV x (1 + r) ^ 3 - n)
= $350 x (1.11) ^ 2 + $350 x (1.11) ^ 1 + $350 x (1.11) ^ 0
= $431.24 + $388.50 + $350.00
= $1,169.74
The Next Step is to Calculate the MIRR using a Financial Calculator :
(-$800) CFj
0 CFj
0 CFj
$1,169.74 CFj
Shift IRR/Yr 113.50 %
Therefore, the MIRR is 13.50 %
Answer:
The project to accept is:
e. E
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Cost of capital = 10%
Mutually Exclusive Projects:
A B C E
Payback (years) 1 5 2 5
IRR 18% 20% 20% 12%
NPV (Millions) $40 $75 $35 $100
b) Project E should be preferred over all the other projects. It has the highest net present value (NPV) and its internal rate of return (IRR) is above the company's cost of capital. It surpasses projects A, B, and C in financial performance terms using time-value of money analysis.
Answer:
A. Decrease
Explanation:
In investment appraisal with the method of Net Present Value, the bone of contention and the central matter is the TIME VALUE OF MONEY.
In the above scenario, the initial working capital was 100% released in proportions of 40%, 40% and 20%, throughout the 3 years of the project. However, if the reverse had been the case, i.e. parting with more cash now and the requirement of working capital now becomes: Year 0 = -10,000, Year 1 = - 10,000, Year 2 = -10,000, Year 3 = +30,000; the NPV would definitely shrink because the value of 10,000 each in Years 0-2 would not be the same when it is recovered from the project in year 3. The value will be smaller and hence the NPV of the project would have decreased as a result of the time value of money.
Answer:
Productivity Growth = 6.1%
Explanation:
Productivity Growth = Current Productivity - Previous Productivity/ Previous Productivity
Productivity Growth = 35-33/33=2/33= 0.0606 or 0.061*100= 6.1%
Productivity Ratio = Output/ Input
Labor Productivity= No of Units/ No of Employees
A preferable approach to productivity measurement is to record multiple physical measures that capture the most important determinants of a company's productivity.