A device or substance for absorbing excessive or unwanted heat.
This should it look like
Answer: While the Pope had granted Spain sovereignty over the New World, de Las Casas argued that the property rights and rights to their own labor still belonged to the native peoples. Natives were subjects of the Spanish crown, and to treat them as less than human violated the laws of God, nature, and Spain.
Answer:
D. Wrote about life in the slums.
Explanation:
He wrote the book “How the Other Half Lives” and he described, wrote and talked about the life in the slums.
I hope it helps! Have a great day!
Pan~
Hi there!
I'm glad you've joined Brainly.
During the rise and peak of Islam, a very structured and organized law system was established based according to the Quran and religion which had been highly depended upon. Due to this, many people did not commit crimes, steal, or lie, knowing that their Lord may punish them. Therefore, this all comes down to establish the very core of the matter: the caliph set laws and punishments which were all agreed upon by scholars, community elders, and respected Muslims.
The caliphs of that age had a system which they called Hokm Islami. This translates to Islamic rule without force. Later, the Ottomans established the forced rule for all, based on certain groups and religion types.
Abu Bakr set many limits on himself as other Caliphs had done. This included equality of wealth for all. There had been a treasury which they called "Bait Ul-Mal" , which the Caliph was not allowed to take money from, unless it was to help the community or poor folks. The Caliph also limited himself to water and basic food to live. He lived in a humble home as other men did.
Aside from money, the Caliph Abu Bakr also made sure that he did not order anything unless it was backed by the Quran, and agreed upon.
I hope this helped. If not, please comment below and I'd certainly be glad to elaborate and add to this description. Thanks! :)
Answer:
Agriculture arose in North America (and western hemisphere more generally) nearly simultaneously as in Asia/eastern hemisphere.
Explanation:
A is not correct because the agriculture in both hemispheres developed almost at the same time.
B is not correct simply because if that was the case there wouldn't have been any developed and complex civilizations in the western hemisphere.
C is correct because the agriculture developed at approximately the same time in both hemispheres, independently from each other, with different crops, with the difference being that in the eastern hemisphere it was much more common than in the western hemisphere over time.
D is not correct because the ice age was still not ended at that time, so agriculture wouldn't have been a possibility, or it would have been too limited and way too hard.