Yes I think they can, if they are trying to agree on moral matters in "Public Policy" I don't see why religion would have to play a part in the discussion
Answer:
<em>Sa</em><em> </em><em>mga</em><em> </em><em>nilalaman</em><em> </em><em>nang</em><em> </em><em>bawat</em><em> </em><em>stereo</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
Explanation:
Ito'y salitang ginagamit sa mag kukumpara sa Isang bagay Tulad nang "Mas maganda yung pencil case ni Mary lite kiysa kang Marie"..
Answer:
World War 1 resulted in a somewhat extended period of time in which an economic boom occurred. After the war, the U.S. became a lender to other territories, including Latin America. Exports to Europe from the U.S. increased as countries prepared for war. The U.S. spending increased as it prepared to enter the war itself.
Leading up to this war between England the new nation, the United States, was the conflict between two European powers, France & England. Napolean of France dominated the European continent & the British dominated the sea with its superior Navy.
<span>The basic problem for the US was the battle for power between England & France. </span>
<span>England put forth a declaration that was called the </span>Orders in<span> Council... </span>
<span>This declaration barred neutral nations from trading with France & her allies. The English plan was to deprive France from receiving essential products by sea from neutral nations such as the United States. The US had developed trade between itself & France and this could be accomplished only by merchant vessels. The problem faced by the USA was that the seas were ruled by the British Royal Navy. </span>
<span>British warships would stop USA ships and kidnap US sailors & the US had no Navy to speak of to stop this. This then was the problem faced by the USA at the beginning of the war between the USA & Britain called the War of 1812. So it's mostly about the shortage of american goods. </span>
