Answer:
Financial accounting is more highly regulated than managerial accounting.
Explanation:
Financial accounting is highly regulated and follows laid down principles that must be followed. International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) are two examples of regulatory guidelines for financial accounting.
On the other hand managerial accounting is flexible and tailored to the manager's needs.
It must not follow the strict guidelines of financial accounting. This is because managerial accounting is used internally by a company and is not subject to public scrutiny.
<h3>Answer: Neither. They will use International Law. </h3>
Explanation:
When companies from different countries get into a contract, it is quite desirable that they stipulate which country's laws that they will abide by should the need arise.
However, if this is not done, there is still a method of enforcing. When not specifically listed, contract between companies from different countries falls under a branch of Private International law which is International Contract Law which is synonymous with International Sales law.
This law falls under the jurisdiction of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) which came into effect in January 1988.
Both France and the United States of America have ratified the law and so Cowboy Hats is free to take legal action within this framework if they so please.
Answer:
It can help in many ways one way being they can hold or help hold events in the community.
Explanation:
A cover letter is the professional communication .
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development. They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
