<h2>
Answer:</h2><h2>$28.40</h2><h2 /><h2>Hope this helps!!</h2>
Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
independent quantity=60 m/h
dependent =time taken=t
60 t=325
t=325/60=65/12=5 5/12 hours
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
It will take you 130 months to pay off this credit card. You will pay $15,411.19 in interest over this period.