Violence I believe. Or a peaceful protest. Can't remember.
Answer:
During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers. However, the relationship between the two nations was a tense one. Americans had long been wary of Soviet communism and concerned about Russian leader Joseph Stalin’s tyrannical rule of his own country. For their part, the Soviets resented the Americans’ decades-long refusal to treat the USSR as a legitimate part of the international community as well as their delayed entry into World War II, which resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of Russians. After the war ended, these grievances ripened into an overwhelming sense of mutual distrust and enmity. Postwar Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe fueled many Americans’ fears of a Russian plan to control the world. Meanwhile, the USSR came to resent what they perceived as American officials’ bellicose rhetoric, arms buildup and interventionist approach to international relations. In such a hostile atmosphere, no single party was entirely to blame for the Cold War; in fact, some historians believe it was inevitable.
Explanation:
Answer:
Trans Saharan Trade Routes
Explanation:
From 1200 to 1450, The integration of West African states into wider regional and transregional economic networks in the period was carried out mostly via Trans Saharan Trade Routes.
This was made possible by the availability of camels and caravans that serves as a means of transportation for both humans and goods between West Africa and North Africa or the Middle East.
The major goods of exchange at the time were Gold in West Africa in exchange for Salt from the Mediterranean region.
The legend of the Trans Saharan Trade Routes was made popular during the time of Mansa Musa, the Malian Empire King. It cut across major cities in West Africa
The United States involvement in the recent events in Rwanda can best be described as intervention. Involvement at all rules out isolation and diplomacy exists as synonymous to international affairs. The actions wouldn't be imperialistic because the US isn't trying to take control of Rwandan affairs thus it must be intervention - a direct involvement in an effort to allow the nation to conduct its own affairs.
