Cephalization is the differentiation of end part of the body into a head in which nerve tissue is concentrated. Sponges have a very loose nervous system and their cells work individually, not controlled by a nervous system. Since they have no defined head as a consequence of concentrated nervous system, the sponges could not have cephalization either.
Answer:
Cell shape is related to its function. It can be justified by citing examples of nerve cell which is long and it helps it to carry information from one part of the body to another. White blood cells and Amoeba do not have a definitive shape; their cells have the ability to change their shape.
Explanation:
can you mark me as brainlist pls
Answer:
46
Explanation:
in mitosis it doubles to 92
Answer:
D. Specialist Species
<h2>
What is the advantage for species to be specialists, and how can they survive in the presence of opportunistic/generalist species?</h2>
In the setting of specialized habitats or unique situations, specialized species exist. When those conditions and surroundings change, they must adapt or go extinct, thus they must survive while they still exist.
When compared to generalists, they have the benefit of efficiency, which increases the likelihood of survival and, hence, reproduction within certain settings or situations. The generalists, on the other hand, have the benefit of being able to survive in a larger variety of circumstances and have a higher probability of doing so.
Cactuses, which are plants adapted to dry environments, are an example of specialization. More generalist plant species would typically outcompete cacti in most habitats on Earth, but very few of such species could endure the harsh conditions of a desert.
Extreme environmental conditions, competition for limited resources, and "evolutionary arms races" are some of the pressures that cause specialization. Cheetahs sprint quickly both because their prey moves quickly and because quicker cheetahs will be more effective hunters and more likely to procreate. The advantage of specialization is clear when seen from the standpoint of catching the next meal on a daily basis.
My key argument is that specialization's benefits must always be viewed in the context of the environment that generated the selective pressure that resulted in specialization. Although experts are specialists because they must be, their specializations put them in danger.
Can you give me the options?
