Answer:
The nutrition therapy goals for the individual with diabetes have evolved and have become more flexible and patient centered. The goals from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2019 include the following: (2)
1.
To promote and support healthful eating patterns, emphasizing a variety of nutrient dense foods in appropriate portion sizes in order to improve overall health and:
➢
Achieve and maintain body weight goals
➢
Attain individualized glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid goals
➢
Delay or prevent complications of diabetes
2.
To address individual nutrition needs based on personal and cultural preferences, health literacy and numeracy, access to healthful food choices, willingness and ability to make behavioral changes, as well as barriers to change
3.
To maintain the pleasure of eating by providing nonjudgmental messages about food choices
4.
To provide an individual with diabetes the practical tools for day-to-day meal planning rather than focusing on individual macronutrients, micronutrients or single foods
The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) guidelines have similar goals for people with type 2 diabetes. (3)
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
All of these
I hope this helps you
please mark me as brainliest
Answer:
The correct answer is - NO.
Explanation:
To be specific to the question, the answer would be no as analogous structures do not show that two distinct come from a common ancestor. However, it shows the evolutionary relationship by stating that the species have different evolutionary origins and developmental patterns as they developed the organs with similar function and appearance but anatomically and embryological development is different.
The answer to the question "Do wings show that a fly is related to a bird?", is no it does not show the relation between fly and bird.
I'll help you with your science
Well it really depends on what kind of change there is. For this I'll use a drought as an example. If a drought occurs in an area the plant life and vegetation will start to die off in that area. From there, primary consumers would run out of food. then secondary consumers, and so forth and so on. it'd be like putting a cow in a field of dirt with no food and a large bucket of water. Eventually the cow will die of starvation. Now apply this to all of the animals in that ecosystem.
