Answer:
The way I see this is less a question on whether or not democracy is good, but whether it's within suitable boundaries to work correctly. The overarching state exists to keep a certain order, and, if someone is to see that status quo as bad, they often won't see a point to voting. If you agree don't think this, you should engage in discussion with them about the current status quo. If you do, you should try to find the least bad candidate if you choose to vote, while focusing on actions outside of a ballot.
Answer:
D. All of the above.
Explanation:
The AICPA's Acts Discreditable Rule at item 1.400.001.10, describe that an AICPA's member can be guilty of committing an act discreditable to the profession if he/she violates any antidiscrimination laws (no matter if it is at federal, state or municipality level), and this item also includes laws related to harassment of any kind.
True, A pledge is a solemn "promise" to another individual to "do something". Thus, undertaking the task "promised"
I hope that makes sense. :)
Answer:isa. an unconditioned stimulus.
Explanation:
According to classical conditioning , the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is the one in which our response occurs naturally , automatic and unconditionally which means we don't learn how to respond.
For example a smell of your favourite pizza will immediately make you feel hungry because it actual triggers this automatic response from you. The smell of food is the unconditioned stimulus.
In Ivan Pavlov's classic experiment with dogs, when the dog smell their food , the salivating that result from them is an unconditioned response and food is the unconditioned stimulus, it an unlearned response that takes place naturally. This is the same as the meat powder above , which is the dog food.