Answer:
In 1debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise. It had four parts: first, California would enter the Union as a free state; second, the status of slavery in the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided by the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be abolished in Washington, D.C.; and fourth, a new Fugitive Slave Act would enable Southerners to reclaim runaway slaves who had escaped to Northern states where slavery was not allowed.
Bleeding Kansas
But the larger question remained unanswered. In 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa and Missouri. According to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit slavery because both were north of the 36º30’ parallel. However, since no Southern legislator would approve a plan that would give more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with a middle ground that he called “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide for themselves whether their states would be slave or free.
Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their view, had caved to the demands of the “slaveocracy” at their expense. The battle for Kansas and Nebraska became a battle for the soul of the nation. Emigrants from Northern and Southern states tried to influence the vote. For example, thousands of Missourians flooded into Kansas in 1854 and 1855 to vote (fraudulently) in favor of slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established a rival government, and soon Kansas spiraled into civil war. Hundreds of people died in the fighting that ensued, known as “Bleeding Kansas.”
A decade later, the civil war in Kansas over the expansion of slavery was followed by a national civil war over the same issue. As Thomas Jefferson had predicted, it was the question of slavery in the West–a place that seemed to be the emblem of American freedom–that proved to be “the knell of the union.”
Well, I don't know your options but the thing that comes most into my head are the following:
External locus of control
beliefs on personal control
Answer:
The FEC places limits on campaign contributions, PACS do not have contribution limits, and people can contribute no more than 2,700$
Explanation:
The reason why the types of technology used on gautrain<em> are beneficial to the users</em> of the Gautrain in 2022 is:
- It makes use of wider track gauge-'Standard Gauge' to enhance speed and also protect the safety of the passengers in the train at high speeds.
<h3>What is Gautrain Train?</h3>
This refers to the type of train transport which makes use of rail systems that are about 80 kilometres long in the district of Gauteng in South Africa but commutes to other areas in the country.
With this in mind, we can see that the the Gautrain Trains are beneficial to the users of the train in 2022 as its safety standards are still top notch for travelers that want to commute in South Africa.
Read more about trains here:
brainly.com/question/1873877
Unequal distribution of rewards between men and women, reflecting their different positions in a social hierarchy is referred to as <u>gender stratification</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Gender stratification means segregating or ranking based on gender. Men were given high social ranking compared to women. In simple, gender stratification is known as gender inequality.
The prestige, social value and personal freedom were not common for both men and women. Women were always restricted in these criteria. This affects their position in the social hierarchy.
The role of men or women in politics clearly reveals the stratification based on gender. Men were given higher authority whereas women were constricted.
