<u>The following are the demerits of electoral competition:</u>
- It creates arguments between societies and one part of the society may get divided into more sub-fractions.
- With the urge to win electoral fights, long term policies do not get formed.
- Political parties point allegations against each other.
- The parties may play dirty politics to win.
- Because of the dirty tricks' parties use, good people do not get into politics to serve the country.
- The government money is misused by the present leaders to win the election.
I believe its coal and iron im sry if im wrong
Answer:The court’s decision ruled that the laws of Louisiana were not in conflict with the Constitution. The justices wrote that Plessy’s defense wrongly assumed that separate facilities somehow made one race automatically inferior to another.
Further, they ruled that if one race is already socially inferior to another, there was nothing that the Constitution or other acts of legislation could do to fix that. To this end, the majority opinion states that the Fourteenth Amendment “could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either.”
Explanation: This comes directly from the answer.
C House of Commons I pretty sure
It is called that because polis was a main person in that period (ancient greek life)
