"Vietnam" was once a French colony, was split by war from 1954 to 1975, and currently exists as a unified, socialist state.
From 1954 to 1975, Vietnam was again partitioned into two separate countries, isolated by the Bến Hải River in Quảng Trị Province at the seventeenth parallel. The North, led by a socialist government, was aligned with comrade China and the Soviet Union, while the South had a free-advertise economy, semi fair government and had contact with the United States, the West and Western-adjusted countries. In spite of the fact that the country has been joined since 1975, phonetic, social, and different contrasts serve to outline the two locales from each other, with going with generalizations.
Answer:
Yes, they were correct demanding the anti-federalist bill or right because "they want to safeguard the liberty"
Explanation:
There are many anti federalist who preferred to have weak central government as they wanted a strong government having British tyranny. Others thought that strong government with the British tyranny will be dominated by wealth so they wanted democracy. According to them the states are giving more power to the new federal government. Anti federalist believed that strong government would threatened the sovereignty and the prestige of the state, localities or he individuals.
According to Police Sergeant Cochrane, it was necessary to pass legislation protecting gays from discrimination because these individuals were at serious risk of death and violence for discrimination.
<h3>What did the Police Sergeant Cochrane represent?</h3>
Charles Henry "Charlie" Cochrane, Jr. was a law enforcement officer and sergeant in the New York Police Department. After his public testimony about pending anti-discrimination legislation before the New York City Council, Cochrane became the NYPD's first openly gay official. He later helped form the Gay Officers Action League (GOAL).
With this information, we can conclude that it was necessary to pass legislation protecting gays from discrimination because these individuals were at serious risk of death and violence for discrimination.
Learn more about legislation protecting gays in brainly.com/question/1194066
#SPJ1
Answer:
A
Explanation:
They were both slaves who contributed to the abolitionist cause.
This is from Psychology 101 isn't it?!
That would be "approval motive", since there's a consciousness over being accepted or rejected.
