Answer: No. It does not violate Title VII if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Cynthia, requested a two-week leave from her employer to go on a religious pilgrimage and that the pilgrimage was not a requirement of her religion, but Cynthia felt it was a calling from God.
Based on the scenario, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave. According to the court, when an employee says that based on his or her religious belief, he or she is required to go to a pilgrimage, the person has to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
In this case, her church which is the Roman Catholic didn't call for a pilgrimage as it was her personal choice. Therefore, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
Answer:
lender.
Explanation:
A lender is an individual or company that makes funds available another com[any. Lenders receive fixed payments based on a predetermined rate at an agreed time.
A shareholder is the owner of a company. A shareholder is a person who buys the stock of a publicly traded company
Supplier provides raw materials needed for production to a company
An investor can either be a lender or shareholder
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "TRUE." Consumers have the right to be protected against false and misleading information about goods and services. This statement is true as far as the consumer's right is concerned.
Answer:
c. evaluate a company's ethical culture
Explanation:
Ethics auditing is used to systematically evaluate an organization's effectiveness when it comes to performance ethics and programs. This will determine both the internal and external impacts of ethical performance. It also helps in identifying the problems and risks in outgoing activities. This way the company can take necessary measures to correct, adjust or eliminate any ethical concerns that may arise.
Fires create external costs because they spread from one building to another. If the government wants to reduce the external costs of fires, <span>should it encourage subsidies for sprinkler systems.
Adding sprinkler systems can reduce the amount of fires that happen and spread because as soon as the fire starts, the sprinklers can put it out. Though these are costly, which they range in price depending on the system type and amount they are able to weigh the pros and cons of the system.
</span>
