Atahualpa, also Atahuallpa, Atabalipa (in Hispanicized spellings) or Atawallpa (Aymara and Quechua)[2][3] (c.1500–26 July 1533) was the last Sapa Inca (sovereign emperor) of the Inca Empire (Tawantinsuyu) before the Spanish conquest. Atahualpa became emperor when he defeated and executed his older half-brother Huáscar in a civil war sparked by the death of their father, Inca Huayna Capac, from an infectious disease (possibly smallpox).[4]
During the Spanish conquest, the Spaniard Francisco Pizarro captured Atahualpa and used him to control the Inca Empire. Eventually, the Spanish executed Atahualpa, effectively ending the empire. Although a succession of several emperors who led the Inca resistance against the invading Spaniards claimed the title of Sapa Inca as rulers of the Neo-Inca State, the empire began to disintegrate after Atahualpa's death.
<span>C. The cultures developed to suit the local climate and
available resources.
I think that this is the best answer. Climate and resources often influence cultures. </span>
a danger of assimilation is that Assimilation forces us to erase or hide who we really are and chase an illusion of success.
<h3>why can assimilation be negative?</h3><h3 />
assimilation means that a person is being indoctrinated and accepted by another culture that is not their original culture.
this can be negative because it often leads to the person erasing or hiding their original culture and who they are in order to fit into the cultural requirements of their adopted culture.
find out more on cultural assimilation at brainly.com/question/2284694.
#SPJ1
Answer: This is what i would put Just as 1947 gave us independence from colonial rule, 1991 started the process that gave Indians freedom from a self-defeating mindset. The next big turning point in Indian history will be the year when we finally get serious about reforming the legal system i hope this helps
Explanation: