1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Valentin [98]
3 years ago
11

What whole number is excluded from 0

Mathematics
2 answers:
Zanzabum3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

first whole no.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Alex3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

which are the natrual numbres 12345678910 and so on..

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helped you

You might be interested in
What is the length of the longest side of a triangle that has vertices at (4, -2), (-4,-2),
BaLLatris [955]
It should be C I am not sure
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A therapist wanted to determine if yoga or meditation is better for relieving stress. The therapist recruited 100 of her high-st
schepotkina [342]

Answer:  Choice B

There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.

========================================================

Explanation:

The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)

This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09

The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09

Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.

Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.

The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.

5 0
3 years ago
given an existing function: f(x)=0.5(x-2)2+3, what transformstiins would have to be made to result in g(x)=-2(x+3)2 -1?
eimsori [14]

Answer:

  • vertical scaling by a factor of -4
  • horizontal translation 5 units left
  • vertical translation 11 units up

Step-by-step explanation:

We notice that the multiplier of the squared term in f(x) is 0.5; in g(x), it is -2, so is a factor of -4 times that in f(x).

If we scale f(x) by a factor of -4, we get ...

  -4f(x) = -2(x -2)² -12

In order for the squared quantity to be x+3, we have to add 5 to the value that is squared in f(x). That is, x -2 must become x +3. We have to replace x with (x+5) to do that, so ...

  (x+5) -2 = x +3

The replacement of x with x+5 amounts to a translation of 5 units to the left.

We note that the added constant after our scaling changes from +3 to -12. Instead, we want it to be -1, so we must add 11 to the scaled function. That translates it upward by 11 units.

The attached graph shows the scaled and translated function g(x):

  g(x) = -4f(x +5) +11

5 0
3 years ago
Find two numbers that sum to -6 and have a product of 12
Drupady [299]

Answer:

i think have fun

Step-by-step explanation:

84

4 0
3 years ago
If an elephant weighs 3.3 tons, how many pounds does it weigh?<br><br> 1 ton = 2,000 pounds
ExtremeBDS [4]
6,600 pounds
2,000 multiply by 3.3 equals 6,600
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can a radical ever be rational?
    7·2 answers
  • Hirato paid 4.28 in sales tax for the items that he purchased
    7·1 answer
  • Solve the equation x2 = 64 for x.
    12·1 answer
  • Please help me! it’s 20 points to help
    13·1 answer
  • I need a help please <br> Answer for me all the question
    7·1 answer
  • Estimate. Then find the product 6 x 219
    15·2 answers
  • How do you multiply monomials with the same base?​
    9·1 answer
  • A rectangle is drawn so that the width is I feet
    15·1 answer
  • PLS HELP!
    12·1 answer
  • Who answers this correctly with explanation gets vevmo'd/pay pal 25<br> Any Links Will Be Reported.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!