I think the answer is true I'm not so sure but if I'm wrong then I'm sorry have a great day :D
The correct answer is Plessy Vs. Ferguson. In the landmark case Plessy vs. Ferguson, it was ruled that segregation of facilities was constitutional as long as those facilities were equal in quality. This is were the term "Separate but Equal" comes from. However, during the case Brown vs. The Board of Education it was ruled that racial segregation violated the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution. It was this ruling that rendered the ruling in Plessy vs. Ferguson invalid because the ruling was unconstitutional.
<span>The confounding variable in mike's experiment is
"gender of campers".
</span>
A confounding variable is an outside impact that alters the
impact of a dependent and independent variable. This incidental impact is
utilized to impact the result of a trial design. For instance, in the event that you are examining whether
absence of activity prompts weight pick up, absence of activity is your independent
variable and weight pick up is your dependent variable. Confounding variables
are any other variable that likewise affect your dependent variable.
The answer is innovation. As indicated by Merton, there are five sorts of aberrance in view of these criteria: congruity, development, formality, retreatism, and resistance. Auxiliary functionalism contends that freak conduct plays a dynamic, useful part in the public eye by at last sticking distinctive populaces inside a general public.
Representatives vote as Their party wishes about<span> two-thirds of the time.
The remaining 1/3 votes are usually used to obtain favor from external groups or from other party's representative. For example, a representative from party A could vote for bill that will benefit corporation X in order to obtain a donation for the party
</span>