Political trends regarding the level of government involvement in social issues are reflected by the success of conservative or liberal perspectives in political parties, in the sense of favoring greater or lesser government involvement in social issues.
The liberal perspective favors greater government regulation in the marketplace and less government involvement in personal privacy issues. Liberalism is only in favor of government intervention of private property rights and freedom.
On the other hand, from the conservative perspective, there is a favoring of lesser government protectionism in the market, private property and trade.
Regarding social issues, the conservative ideology favors the government to be less involved in decisions so that greater social and economic equality is achieved.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/2261035
The Appointments Clause [of Article II] clearly implies a power of the Senate to give advice on and, if it chooses to do so, to consent to a nomination, but it says nothing about how the Senate should go about exercising that power. The text of the Constitution thus leaves the Senate free to exercise that power however it sees fit. Throughout American history, the Senate has frequently – surely, thousands of times – exercised its power over nominations by declining to act on them.
