1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inga [223]
3 years ago
11

“As a person may do as her or she pleases in this country”

Law
2 answers:
Artist 52 [7]3 years ago
3 0
I think the answer is A hope this helps if not I’m sorry
valentina_108 [34]2 years ago
3 0

"Under current First Amendment jurisprudence, hate speech can only be criminalized when it directly incites imminent criminal activity or consists of specific threats of violence targeted against a person or group."

"Hate Speech and Hate Crime", American Library Association, December 12, 2017.

A is wrong because hate speech is permitted.

C is wrong because it does not convey the message of the image.

D is wrong because the first amendment does protect speech that is deemed offensive.

Therefore, the only correct answer is B.

I hope this helps! :)

You might be interested in
PLS ANSWER/HELP: Which element distinguishes routine activity theory from situational crime prevention?
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

The correct answer is B. The presence of an overbearing guardian distinguishes routine activity theory from situational crime prevention.

Explanation:

Situational crime prevention is a criminal theory that establishes that all crime can be stopped before its development if the situations or contextual conditions that favor its development are modified.

Thus, the presence of a policeman in a certain place, for example, modifies the context for the criminal, who knows that he will not be able to carry out his crime in the place where this policeman is. Thus, the presence of a guard limits the development of the crime, by modifying the context in which the criminal seeks to develop his activity.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Trace the history of public law enforcement in the United States across any century.
Vikki [24]

Answer:

The development of policing in the United States closely followed the development of policing in England. In the early colonies policing took two forms. It was both informal and communal, which is referred to as the “Watch,” or private-for-profit policing, which is called “The Big Stick” (Spitzer, 1979).

The watch system was composed of community volunteers whose primary duty was to warn of impending danger. Boston created a night watch in 1636, New York in 1658 and Philadelphia in 1700. The night watch was not a particularly effective crime control device. Watchmen often slept or drank on duty. While the watch was theoretically voluntary, many “volunteers” were simply attempting to evade military service, were conscript forced into service by their town, or were performing watch duties as a form of punishment. Philadelphia created the first day watch in 1833 and New York instituted a day watch in 1844 as a supplement to its new municipal police force (Gaines, Kappeler, and Vaughn 1999).

Augmenting the watch system was a system of constables, official law enforcement officers, usually paid by the fee system for warrants they served. Constables had a variety of non-law enforcement functions to perform as well, including serving as land surveyors and verifying the accuracy of weights and measures. In many cities constables were given the responsibility of supervising the activities of the night watch.

These informal modalities of policing continued well after the American Revolution. It was not until the 1830s that the idea of a centralized municipal police department first emerged in the United States. In 1838, the city of Boston established the first American police force, followed by New York City in 1845, Albany, NY and Chicago in 1851, New Orleans and Cincinnati in 1853, Philadelphia in 1855, and Newark, NJ and Baltimore in 1857 (Harring 1983, Lundman 1980; Lynch 1984). By the 1880s all major U.S. cities had municipal police forces in place.

These “modern police” organizations shared similar characteristics: (1) they were publicly supported and bureaucratic in form; (2) police officers were full-time employees, not community volunteers or case-by-case fee retainers; (3) departments had permanent and fixed rules and procedures, and employment as a police officers was continuous; (4) police departments were accountable to a central governmental authority (Lundman 1980).

In the Southern states the development of American policing followed a different path. The genesis of the modern police organization in the South is the “Slave Patrol” (Platt 1982). The first formal slave patrol was created in the Carolina colonies in 1704 (Reichel 1992). Slave patrols had three primary functions: (1) to chase down, apprehend, and return to their owners, runaway slaves; (2) to provide a form of organized terror to deter slave revolts; and, (3) to maintain a form of discipline for slave-workers who were subject to summary justice, outside of the law, if they violated any plantation rules. Following the Civil War, these vigilante-style organizations evolved in modern Southern police departments primarily as a means of controlling freed slaves who were now laborers working in an agricultural caste system, and enforcing “Jim Crow” segregation laws, designed to deny freed slaves equal rights and access to the political system.

The key question, of course, is what was it about the United States in the 1830s that necessitated the development of local, centralized, bureaucratic police forces? One answer is that cities were growing. The United States was no longer a collection of small cities and rural hamlets. Urbanization was occurring at an ever-quickening pace and old informal watch and constable system was no longer adequate to control disorder. Anecdotal accounts suggest increasing crime and vice in urban centers. Mob violence, particularly violence directed at immigrants and African Americans by white youths, occurred with some frequency. Public disorder, mostly public drunkenness and sometimes prostitution, was more visible and less easily controlled in growing urban centers than it had been rural villages (Walker 1996). But evidence of an actual crime wave is lacking. So, if the modern American police force was not a direct response to crime, then what was it a response to?

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
An example of when civil law begins would be when _______.
balandron [24]

Answer:

a. a plaintiff enters a claim against a person or entity that failed in a duty to the plaintiff.

Explanation:

Law can be defined as the system of principles, regulations and rules established by legislature, that is adopted in a community, society or country to regulate the actions of its citizens, members or employees.

Thus, law is a tool used by the judiciary, lawyers, individuals, organizations, and even government to ensure everybody is well behaved, non-criminal and civil in their actions. Therefore, a law creates the foundation for ethical behavior.

In circumstances where there are aberration, the law is enforced as a punishment and penalty for wrongdoings or misdeeds.

There are various types of law and these includes; criminal law, constitutional law, intellectual property law, corporate law, international law, family law, civil law, etc.

Civil law can be defined as a legal system that deals with private relationships or disputes between individuals, organizations or both in order to prevent escalation into crimes or violent confrontations. Some examples of civil law includes libel, defamation, property ownership, marriage, breach of contract, etc.

Hence, an example of when civil law begins would be when a plaintiff enters a claim against a person or entity that failed in a duty to the plaintiff.

A plaintiff refers to an individual who starts (initiates) a lawsuit against another party for misdeeds, wrongdoings or neglectful actions.

8 0
3 years ago
What rules govern the changes in a written contract?
Rashid [163]

Most generally, instructions laid out in the contract itself. Other than that, they can be changed by consent of all parties, or in the case of a business, the majority of the stakeholders of the company .
3 0
2 years ago
Should a Female with the same Qualifications as a Man, if selected for an Executive Position formerly held by a man, be paid the
ad-work [718]

Answer:

The simple answer is yes a female should be paid the same, but often this is not the case.

Explanation:

Morally, yes a female with the same qualifications and experience should be paid the same salary as the counterpart prior to her, though it is not a law that there can't be a wage gap between women and men and this is most commonly not a reality. Women are often paid less than men with the same degree, qualifications, and experience, especially if the woman is part of a racial minority, or in a male dominated industry. Often, employers are able to find loopholes and reasons, "justifying" this unjust wage gap.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The ancient Greeks practiced_______ by allowing people to vote and government issues
    11·2 answers
  • California's constitution outlines the structure of government 1 point at the municipal level only. at the local level only. at
    12·1 answer
  • If you were to design a vehicle feature that monitors changes to the speed of the car,what scientific concepts would you think a
    9·1 answer
  • Do you think you would be able to memorize all the 10-codes on the list, or would you have to refer to a chart?
    7·1 answer
  • What are the terms of office for members of Congress?
    8·2 answers
  • Look at the graphic of the three branches of government. Explain to a sixth grade student what these three branches did for the
    13·1 answer
  • Is it legal to go to someone’s house to peaceful confront them about a scam?
    12·2 answers
  • How long does it take to clean a school
    6·1 answer
  • When courts consider the plight of a defendant forced to defend a lawsuit in another state they are looking for the constitution
    10·1 answer
  • Because teens can obtain tobacco illegally, ____ are being removed from unsupervised areas.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!