Answer:
d
Explanation:
D.because it wants to promote unity among employees
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": for negligence because the harm was foreseeable.
Explanation:
In Law, foreseeability is a concept related to what the proximate causes could be after an event. The concept is helpful to determine the limit of liability according to the primary event that happened and the type and manner of harm. The harm caused by rescuers like firefighters and negligence of health care providers like doctors and nurses is considered foreseeable.
<em>In Emmy's case, the repeated thefts to the store where she works while having a nonfunctioning alarm (negligence) make the store owner liable for the injuries caused by a perpetrator who broke Emmy's leg during a robbery since that event was foreseeable.</em>
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
Explanation:
Given that:
a)
1$ = Can $1.12
It takes a value of 1 U.S dollar to have 1.12 Canadian dollars. This signifies that the U.S dollar is worth more than Canadian dollars.
b)
Assuming that the absolute Purchasing Power Parity PPP holds,
Since 1$ = Can $1.12, the cost in the United States of an Elkhead beer, if the price in Canada is Can$2.85 can be determined to be:
= 
= $2.545
c)
Yes, the U.S. dollar is selling at a premium relative to the Canadian dollar.
This is because we are being told that the spot exchange rate for the Canadian dollar is Can $1.12 & in six (6) months time the forward rate will be Can $1.14.
d)
The U.S dollar is expected to appreciate in value because it is trading at a premium in the forward market.
e)
Canada has higher interest rates. This determined by using the formula:
= 
where; n= numbers of years = 6 month/12 month = 0.5 year
Then;



= 0.0356
= 3.56%