So in matt's equation, he made a mistake in the a transision from line 2 to line 3
in line 2: -4(-2)2
in line 3: -4(4)
the mistake is that -2 times 2 is not equal +4 it is equal to -4
also from lines 5 to 6 he made a mistake in order of opperations (mulit division then addition and subtract)
line 5: -10+30/5
line 6: 20/5
so he first subtracted 10 then divided, he should have divided then subtracted
so the equation should have equaled
Karen used the correct (-) times (+) property and the order of operations
so Karen is correct and Matt is wrong.
The blank spaces in the task content can be filled with; Substitution property, 90° and subtraction property.
<h3>What are the missing statements in the proof?</h3>
Since it follows from the vertical angles theorem that angle 1 = angle 4 as they are congruent.
Additionally, angles 1 and 2 are said to be complementary and hence, the sum of their measures is equal to 90°.
Finally, by virtue of the subtraction property of equality, the measure of angle 2 is; 90° - 40° = 50°.
Read more on complementary angles;
brainly.com/question/16281260
#SPJ1
Answer:
-5,6,-2/3,1 1/3,0
Step-by-step explanation:
I think this how it goes try it out or not i need help to
Answer:
Rational
Step-by-step explanation:
An irrational number is any number that cannot be turned into a fraction. 7 can be turned into a fraction.
