The author of Source 3 counters the argument regarding giant pandas by stating that they're beneficial to the ecosystem.
<h3>What is an argument?</h3>
It should be noted that an argument simply means the stance of an individual regarding an issue.
In this case, the author of Source 3 most clearly counter the argument in Source 1 that protecting giant pandas isn't appropriate by stating that they play an important role in the ecosystem.
Learn more about arguments on:
brainly.com/question/3775579
Tree roots absorb water - A
Answer:
false
Explanation:
in the sweet hereafter by russell banks, mitchell stephens (a lawyer) approachs billy ansel at one point and offers billy legal representation. billy however refuses mitchell's offer of legal representation. billy doesn't want to be involved in a lawsuit like the other parents of children who died in the bus accident do because no amount of money can bring billy's children (his twins) back to him. billy has no need for money for his loss and does not want it either.
