Answer:
$7,000
Explanation:
depreciation expense using straight line method = (purchase cost - salvage value) / useful life = ($53,400 - $3,000) / 6 years ) = $8,400 per year
since the machine was used for 10 months, the depreciation expense for 2017 = $8,400 x 10/12 = $7,000
the adjusting journal entry should be:
December 31, 2017, depreciation expense
Dr Depreciation expense 7,000
Cr Accumulated depreciation - copy machine 7,000
Answer:
A one-time error in the application of the lower of cost or market/net realizable value (LCM/NRV) rule in the current period distorts financial results for the current accounting period:
a. only.
Explanation:
The lower of cost or market (LCM/NRV) method states that when valuing a company's inventory use the historical cost or the market value, whichever is lower. The historical cost refers to the cost at which the inventory was purchased. The market value is the current price. The implication is that while the historical cost remains static, the market value shifts over time.
Therefore, if there is a one-time error made in the use of the LCM/NRV rule, it only affects the current period. The next accounting period will restart the process of comparing the historical costs with the market value, thus obviating the need to repeat the error.
Answer:
It is TRUE that a flour manufacturer is more likely to use process costing than job-order costing whereas a manufacturer of customized leather jackets is more likely to use job-order costing than a process costing.
Explanation:
This is because typically, a Job-order costing process is best suited for a production system whereby there are several different products or services and. And these products are tailored to individual consumers or customer specifications.
On the other hand, process costing is a form of cost that is best suited for manufacturing homogenous products and can be produced massively. Hence, flour manufacturer in the uses Process costing while customized leather Jacket producers would opt for Job order costing process
Answer:
$48,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Ending owner's equity = $70,000
Beginning owner's equity = $45,000
Owner's withdrawals = $23,000
There were no new capital contributions during the year.
Net income (loss):
= Ending owner's equity - Beginning owner's equity + Owner's withdrawals
= $ 70,000 - $ 45,000 + $ 23,000
= $48,000
Therefore, the net income for the year is $48,000.
