Prepare what you are going to say! If you just say something without thinking first, it can escalate the situation even more. Hope this was helpful ;)
Answer:
D
Explanation:
An ideal writing structure to help a reader understand a certain event is chronological text structure. Chronological order lists the pieces of the events from the start to the end in the order they happen. So, the answer is D.
The sentence from the passage that best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate is: The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didn't have as much supporting evidence.
A parliamentary debate is held in academic settings and it originated from the British Parliament. In a parliamentary debate their are two sides who have their own points and support them with evidence.
In the chosen option, we see that the Taft team had a counterclaim. Even though they were making an argument, they did not have a supporting evidence.
This shows that they were engaging in a parliamentary debate that they were not properly prepared for.
Learn more about parliamentary debates here:
brainly.com/question/1695492
