Answer:
ME! obviously...
Explanation:
In all seriousness the govornment should honor specifically service workers, the people in our society that do good for the sake of making the world just a tad bit better, very rarely should we put the spotlight on one specific person.
Answer:
A). However, the most successful way of combating smallpox before the discovery of vaccination was inoculation.
Explanation:
Central claim is elucidated as the key idea or argument that functions to unify the work in a single coherent thought.
The first option states the controlling idea of the given excerpt as it dominates the entire passage. It conveys the main idea of 'inoculation being one of the most successful ways to combat smallpox prior to the discovery of vaccination' to the reader which serves the key purpose of the author('to inform them about the treatment of smallpox before the discovery of vaccination'). It is the <u>central claim of the author that unifies the various ideas of the excerpt together in a unified thought</u>. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
Don’t stay in a hidden area when you know that there are people that want to kill you. Next time...get the he** out of there.
Jeremy spent all weekend cramming<span> for a </span>test<span> on </span>time management<span>. When </span>he got<span> to</span>school<span>, </span>he realized<span> the </span>test wasn't until<span> the </span>following week<span>.</span>
There are some differences betwee summarizing and quoting. Summarizing: doesn't match the source word for word, presents a broad overview, so is usually much shorter than the original text, involves putting the main idea/ideas into your own words, but including only the main point, must be attributed to the original source. Quoting: match the source word for word, must be attributed to the original source, appear between quotation marks, are usually a brief segment of the text. So, as for me, summarizing is not really useful alternative to quoting.
