Yes..............................yes they do.
Answer: Externalities are side effects (good or bad) that occur when a person or a company performs an activity and does not assume all the costs of it, or all the benefits that could be reported. In this way we can distinguish:
Negative externality: Arises when not all the costs of a negative effects are assumed. In these cases, a social cost is generated, since it is the whole society that suffers the consequences of its actions. And the market price does not collect this cost.
Positive externality: Arises from a positive effect that is not reported as a benefit. An example of positive externality that we can mention is scientific research, from which society in general benefits. In these cases, market place do not reflect the real benefits.
I believe he controlled people opinions, the influenced them with games and other things. Public feasts and holidays were another popular opinion influence.
Answer:
It allowed farmers to quickly ship cotton to port cities for transport to overseas markets.
Explanation:
The invention of the steamboat in the early 1800s promoted economic development in Georgia by allowing farmers to quickly ship cotton to port cities for transport to overseas markets.
The steamboat became a crucial part of the revolution in transportation. It became a defining aspect of the cotton kingdom. The Mississippi River was an essential water highway in United States that helped the South. The steamboats helped to transport cotton on the plantations from the South to the port at New Orleans. From there, tge cotton was carried to Liverpool, England where British manufacturers who ran cotton mills bought them. It actually led to creation of new wealth and new residents to that city.
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
