The correct answer is D I believe, but plz correct me if I’m wrong!
A...bay? I don't really know, Im just guessing.
Answer:
Imagine that you and your friends went out for the night. You and 2 other friends decide to go destroy property and trespass on fields. The other friend didn’t do it, but does have it on video and did watch it happen. Well if interdependent wasn’t a thing, then your friends couldn’t depend on that friend to keep it a secret. Get it?
If the world price of cotton falls, firms will be less willing to supply cotton. Therefore, fewer cotton firms may open, or few people will be employed in the cotton-producing industry; therefore, the demand for labour for cotton-producing firms in South Carolina will decrease.
Since the world price of cotton falls, a textile-producing firm in South Carolina which uses cotton as only one aspect of their textiles, textile firms can buy more cotton since it's cheaper and will reduce costs. Since this is the case, the demand for cotton will increase. Because of this, more textiles need to be made, and so the demand for labour increases as a result.
The unemployment resulting from such sectoral shifts in the economy is best described as structural since demand for labour is decreasing in the primary sector and increasing in the secondary sector of the industry.<span>
</span>
Answer:
D) The Soviet economy was a tremendous success story; the USSR would still be together if it were not for the ethnic differences.
Explanation:
The Soviet economy was not a tremendous success, in fact, it was in many aspects a failure (although it was a success in some fields).
The other 3, true statements in the question give us a clue why:
The Soviet system benefited the center (Russia) disproportionally, leaving aside the other, peripheral republics in Central Asia, the Caucasus, The Baltics, and Eastern Europe, which were often very poor.
The Soviet system used a planned economy, instead of a market economy, and this led to many errors in the production of goods and services. Resources were often poured in unprofitable industries over more profitable ones, and the geographical location of the economic sectors often did not make sense.
Things that in a market system would likely not happen, ocurred in the soviet planned economy because the planners did not realize their mistakes.
