All categories

3 years ago

an increase in aggregate demand in the economy will have what effect on macroeconomic equilibrium in the long run?

Business

1 answer:

tino4ka555 [31]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

An increase in aggregate demand in the economy will have what effect on macroeconomic equilibrium in the long run? A. The price level will rise, and the level of GDP will fall.

You might be interested in

What key stage involves defining your project? a. Representing your data in a trustworthy manner b. Working with data c. Develop

STatiana [176]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "C": Developing your design solution.

Explanation:

Every project borns with the idea of finding a solution to a problematic situation. While designing a project coming up with what the solution is for the problem that you would like to attempt solving is vital because from there part all the steps on what and how it is going to be done.

7 0

3 years ago

Last year, Cayman Corporation had sales of $7,000,000, total variable costs of $3,000,000, and total fixed costs of $1,500,000.

UNO [17]

Answer:

b. 13.9%

Explanation:

sales 7,000,000

variable cost (3,000,000)

contribution 4,000,000

fixed cost (1,500,000)

interest (480,000)

EBT 2,020,000

tax expense (707,000)

net income 1,313,000

contribution margin 4,000,000 / 7,000,000 = 4/7

if sales increase by 7%:

7,000,000 x 0.07 x 4/7 x (1- 0.35) = 182,000

income after increase in sales: 1,313,000 + 182,000 = 1,495,000

increase in earnings: 1,495,000 / 1,313,000 - 1 = 0.138613861 = 13.9%

3 0

3 years ago

Fundamental analysis determines that the price of a firm's stock is too low, given its intrinsic value. The information used in

Allisa [31]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "B": Neglected-firm effect.

Explanation:

The Neglected-firm effect has the purpose to explain why small companies that are not well-known have better performances than the ones that are. The theory explains that smaller companies' stocks generate higher returns because they are unlikely to be studied by market analysis. In that sense, because no much information is provided by the smaller firms -even lesser than what is required by law, they are neglected by analysts since there are very few data to take a look at.

8 0

3 years ago

Estimate the liquid density (g/cm3) of propane at 298 K and 10 bar. Compare the price per kilogram of propane to the price of re

Deffense [45]

Answer:

Density of propane = 17.8 g/L

Propane is more priced than gasoline

Explanation:

Given:

Temperature, T = 298 K

Pressure, P = 10 bar = 0.987 × 10 = 9.87 atm

now,

Molar mass of propane, M = 44.1 g/mol

From ideal gas law

⇒ PV = nRT

here,

n is the number of moles

R is the ideal gas constant = 0.0821 L.atm/mol.K

also,

Density, D = $\frac{\textup{Mass}}{\textup{Volume(V)}}$

V = $\frac{\textup{Mass}}{\textup{D}}$

and,

nM = mass

thus,

V = $\frac{\textup{nM}}{\textup{D}}$

substituting in the ideal gas relation

we have

P = $\frac{\textup{DRT}}{\textup{M}}$

D = $\frac{\textup{PM}}{\textup{RT}}$

D = $\frac{9.87\times44.1}{0.0821\times298}$

D = 17.8 g/L

Now,

1 gallon = 3.78 Liter

Therefore,

5 gallon = 5 × 3.78 Liter = 18.9 Liter

Thus,

mass of 5 gallon propane = Volume × Density

= 18.9 Liter × 17.8 g/L

= 336.42 g

= 0.336 kg

also it is given that Price of 5 gallon propane i.e 0.336 kg = $30

Therefore,

Price per kg = $\frac{30}{0.336}$

= $89.28

and,

Mass of 5 gallons i.e 18.9 Liter gasoline = Density × Volume

= 0.692 g/cm³ × 18.9 Liter

also,

1 L = 1000 cm³

thus,

= 0.692 g/cm³ × 18.9 × 1000 cm³

= 13078.8 g

= 13.078 kg

Therefore,

Price per kg of gasoline = $\frac{\$30}{13.078}$

= $2.29

hence, propane is more priced than gasoline

4 0

3 years ago

Arthur Corporation has a margin of safety percentage of 25% based on its actual sales. The break-even point is $290,400 and the

timurjin [86]

Answer:

$53,240

Explanation:

We know that,

Break even point = Fixed cost ÷ contribution margin ratio

$290,400 = Fixed cost ÷ 55%

So, the fixed cost = $290,400 × 55% = $159,720

As the variable expense is 45% and we assume the sales is 100%, so the contribution ratio would be 100% - 45% = 55%

Now the margin of safety equal to

= (Expected sales - break even sales) ÷ (expected sales) × 100

25% = (Expected sales - $290,400) ÷ (expected sales) × 100

25% Sales = (Expected sales - $290,400)

So, the expected sales would be

= $290,400 ÷ 75%

= $387,200

Now the actual profit equals to

= Sales - variable expenses - fixed cost

= $387,200 - $174,240 - $159,720

= $53,240

The variable expense is computed below:

= $387,200 × 45%

= $174,240

4 0

3 years ago