Answer:
It affects the motion of a gymnast in many ways...including falling off the beam, wobbling, and messing up skills. As the gymnast's legs exert that extra force, the beam is stretched more than normal and thus exerts a larger than normal force on the gymnast, causing her to fly up into the air and allowing her to perform her jump. One of the forces acting on the gymnast is gravity and weight. It also can be the way she jumps. But from whatit looks like its a really good 180 split jump/leap.
Explanation:
I know this because im a gymnast myself
I hope this helps
Restoring an insured to the same condition as before a loss is an example of the principle of Indemnity. The principle of indemnity makes sure that the insurance contract protects and compensates you for any loss, damage or injury. The objective of an insurance contract is to make you "whole" in case of a loss, not to allow you to make a profit. Thus, the amount of your compensation for damages is directly related to the amount of damages you actually suffered.
The principle of indemnity states that an insurance policy will not provide compensation to the policyholder in excess of their financial loss. This limits the benefit to an amount that is sufficient to recover the policyholder to the same financial position they were in before the loss.
Learn more about the Principle of Indemnity:
brainly.com/question/11431424
#SPJ4
The convection currets i think it is hope this helps you :)
Answer:
sight is the most important sense we use, We perceive up to 80% of all impressions by means of our sight. And if other senses such as taste or smell stop working, sight is best to protect us from danger.
Answer:
Federalism is the system where sovereignty is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority and constituent units.
Explanation:
Federalism is the system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority and constituent political units. It is based upon democratic rules and institutions in which the power to govern is shared between national and state governments, creating a federation. Dual federalism is a political arrangement in which power is divided between national and state governments in clearly defined terms, with state governments exercising those powers accorded to them without interference from the national government. Dual federalism is defined in contrast to cooperative federalism, in which national and state governments collaborate on policy. Dual and cooperative federalism are also known as ‘layer-cake’ and ‘marble cake’ federalism, respectively, due to the distinct layers of layer cake and the more muddled appearance of marble cake.
Federalism was the most influential political movement arising out of discontent with the Articles of Confederation, which focused on limiting the authority of the federal government. The movement was greatly strengthened by the reaction to Shays’ Rebellion of 1786-1787, which was an armed uprising of farmers in western Massachusetts. The rebellion was fueled by a poor economy that was created, in part, by the inability of the federal government to deal effectively with the debt from the American Revolution. Moreover, the federal government had proven incapable of raising an army to quell the rebellion, so Massachusetts was forced to raise its own.
The most forceful defense of the new Constitution was The Federalist Papers , a compilation of 85 anonymous essays published in New York City to convince the people of the state to vote for ratification. These articles, written by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, examined the benefits of the new Constitution and analyzed the political theory and function behind the various articles of the Constitution. Those opposed to the new Constitution became known as the Anti-Federalists. They were generally local, rather than cosmopolitan, in perspective, oriented toward plantations and farms rather than commerce or finance, and wanted strong state governments with a weaker national government. The Anti-Federalists believed that the legislative branch had too much unchecked power, that the executive branch had too much power, and that there was no check on the chief executive. They also believed that a Bill of Rights should be coupled with the Constitution to prevent a dictator from exploiting citizens. The Federalists argued that it was impossible to list all the rights and that those not listed could be easily overlooked because they were not in the official bill of rights.
