Answer:
cil transmitir información sobre los derechos humanos que modificar actitudes y conductas. Es afectar los corazones, los estilos de vida, las convicciones. Educar en derechos humanos no puede reducirse al orden intelectual, pertenece al reino de los sentimientos, de las pasiones, porque supone trascender la palabra y pasar a la acción.
Explanation:
Answer: trump wants to secure our bodes and stabilize immigrants before we over flow and drown in dept
biden wants to do work withen or country by helping senoir cizens
if you need why not to both then Trump doent know how to bite his tongue and shutup that could lead to few proplems but
biden is a pedlafiler so pick ur battels.
hair sniffer or big mouth
The Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 as it allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar.
<h3>Is gerrymandering is a major problem in the United States? </h3>
The United States Supreme Court has declared in Millerv. Johnson( 1995) that ethnical gerrymandering is a violation of indigenous rights and upheld opinions against redistricting that's deliberately cooked grounded on race. still, the Supreme Court has plodded when prejudiced gerrymandering occurs.
It allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar. The manipulation may correspond of" cracking"( lacing the voting power of the opposing party's sympathizers across numerous sections) or" packing"( concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one quarter to reduce their voting power in other sections). Gerrymandering can also be used to cover incumbents.
Learn further about the Supreme court here: https//brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
If Pamela appeals the case in order to include the witness who saw Darin driving, it is possible that the appeals court will not take the witness's testimony into account.
<h3>What happens if Pamela appeals?</h3>
Appeals courts are not there to retry a case or to give the case a new trial. Their purpose is to check if there were errors in the way the lower court handled the case.
This means that they often do not take new witness testimony into account. What this means for Pamela is that even though she has a new witness, the appeals court might not consider the testimony of the witness because they were not used in the first court.
Find out more on the appeals process at brainly.com/question/1897528
#SPJ1
