Answer:
b. The defendant's conduct was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's emotional distress
Explanation:
The act must be intentional, offensive and it could not possibly be considered as a mistake or joke which led to emotional distress in the plaintiff. That is, the emotional distress experienced by the plaintiff must be linked to the conducts/actions of the defendant,
There is no consideration and therefore no enforceable contract for transactions relating to Gifts.
A gift is a contract without fair consideration and requires performance to be valid. A valid gift is therefore a concluded contract by the giver's actual delivery of the gifted item to the donee or someone on behalf of the donee, or by the giver's delivery of the means of obtaining the gifted item without further action for possession.
The intention to give must be accompanied by service, and service must be done with the intention to do. Otherwise, there is only the intention or promise of being gratuitous, and it is simply void. The transfer of ownership of the gift item or means of obtaining it is essential to making a valid donation, in order to render it an irrevocable disposal.
Know more about gift contract here
brainly.com/question/24157554
#SPJ4
Answer:
Employment, property and family law.
Explanation:
The ERA has to be considered in its historical context. It was first proposed in 1923, at a time where women had little or no rights regarding work and payment and faced discrimination. The ERA proposed a total abolition of law discrimination based on sex, which would have been revolutionary at the time. Later, during the 1960s and 1970s when the ERA was again discussed, some of the problems were solved with other laws, like the Equal Pay Act or the Civil Rights Acts. However, while these acts are a key part of American Legislation, the ERA is a Constitutional Amendment, which would give a completely new level of protection.
There is criticism, mainly because many of the laws and guarantees gained during the past 100 years have been tailored to protect women in their specificity. And many fear that the ERA would negatively override those protections. However, as an Amendment, any discrimination based on sex could be challenged based on unconstitutionality. And as of now, women still suffer discrimination and the acts and laws enacted so far are not sufficient.
