Answer:
Sharla is an example of a non-sanctioned leader.
Explanation:
A non-sanctioned leader has the <em>ability to influence other individuals </em>within the<em> organizational scenario. </em>
In this case, even though the three individuals were hired for the same position and at the same time, it can be understood that Sharla has the ability to influence the others and is thus viewed as the leader. In this case she is an example of a non-sanctioned leader.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
C. Sociologists are interested in understanding broad social factors; psychologists are interested in understanding how individuals think.
Explanation:
Although sociology and psychology constantly intersect in many of their interests of study, there are certain fundamental differences between the two sciences.
While sociology is interested in the study of the phenomenon of social interaction in human beings, taking into account its problems, its operation, its structure, its development among other factors.
Psychology on the other hand, is interested in the study of the individual himself, taking into account their mind and behavior as main axes. Within the factors that psychology takes into account for the study of the individual's mind and behavior, it is also necessary to have into consideration aspects such as cognitive development, health, behavior and social interaction among other aspects.
Islamic armies faced major resistance from cities in the Persian Empire. Islam first developed in Europe and then spread inland through Africa. Islam had its origins in Constantinople before spreading to Arabia.
Answer:
Explanation:
The term cultural region is used to divide a territory into smaller areas into ethnographic or regional groups. Cultural regions are also used for showing a territory where many peoples live that have similar cultural features. They use this information to analyze certain social or demographic variables to understand them as something common to more areas instead of just a situation of some region.
Answer:
Most historians rank Harding as the worst of all American Presidents. Recently, some revisionists see him as an important transitional figure whose easy-going ways helped bridge the gap between Wilsonian idealism and the business prosperity of the Coolidge and Hoover years. Harding is also given some credit for his progressive views on race and civil rights.
Hope this helps!
